In a presentation at the Africa Consultative Workshop
on the sidelines of ACW, Salina Sanou of the Pan
Africa Climate Justice Alliance (PACJA), said there is need to continue
supporting indigenous women-led organisations to empower them as role models.
She added that gender disintegrated
data is a good way of identifying and rectifying gaps in monitoring progress in
the climate change discussion.
“Women and men are experiencing climate change
differently, as gender
inequalities persist around the world, recognising the important contributions of women as decision makers,
stakeholders, and experts across
sectors and at all levels can lead to successful,
long-term solutions to climate change. Indigenous
women are an important part of the REDD+ process and the climate change discussion
and cannot be ignored,” she said.
Climate
change represents the most complex challenge which requires a concerted,
proactive and holistic response.
Gender
inequality may dramatically limit the resilience and adaptive capacity of
women, families and communities. It may also restrict options for climate
change mitigation.
According to the UN Food and
Agriculture Organisation, if women had the same access to productive resources
as men, they could increase yields on their farms by 20-30 percent which could
raise total agricultural output in developing countries by 2.5 to 4 percent.
Evidence
shows that women’s empowerment and advancing gender equality can deliver
results across sectors, and lead to more environmentally friendly decision
making at household and national levels.
Across
societies, women are often responsible for gathering and producing food,
collecting water and sourcing fuel for heating and cooking. With climate
change, these tasks are becoming more difficult. Extreme weather events such as
droughts and floods have a greater impact on the poor and most vulnerable.
Despite
women being disproportionately affected by climate change, they play a crucial
role in climate change adaptation and mitigation. Women have the knowledge and
understanding of what is needed to adapt to changing environmental conditions
and to come up with practical solutions. But they are still a largely untapped
resource.
Salina
said unleashing the knowledge and capability of women represents an important
opportunity to craft effective climate change solutions for the benefit of all.
“Restricted
land rights, lack of access to financial resources, training and technology,
and limited access to political decision-making spheres often prevent them from
playing a full role in tackling climate change and other environmental
challenges,” she noted.
Betty Maitoyo, a Gender
Specialist with indigenous
organisation, Mainyoto Peoples Integrated Development organisation (MPIDO), observed
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) for instance should move beyond
symbolic measures and ensure gender mainstreaming in all its activities
(funding and representation).
Countries, according to
her, should robustly involve women, CSOs and indigenous peoples in development
of local and national plans and their monitoring and implementation.
“Budget should be set
aside in the existing programme to enhance awareness to end gender-stereotypes
and to support project women and women leaders,” she said.
In 2015, women made up on
the average 38 percent of United Nations Framework Conventions on Climate
Change (UNFCCC) national delegation.
According to records from
the Roots for Future, IUCN-GGCA, in same year, participation of women on
climate finance mechanism boards was not impressive.
Women accounted for 25
percent in Global Environmental Facility, 15 percent in Green Climate Fund, 26
percent in Climate Investment Fund, 11 percent in Climate Development
Mechanism, and 35 percent in Adaptation Fund.
This is a trend that the women
groups and other civil society organisations at the meeting expressed as
woefully inadequate.
For Betty, Climate finance should be
accessible to both men and women and designed to generate mutual benefits, not
exacerbate patterns of inequity.
Meanwhile, global
negotiations have increasingly reflected the growing understanding of gender
considerations in climate decision making over the last eight years.
For instance, women
accounted for 29 percent whiles the men 71
percent of National Focal Point of the Global Environmental Facility at the Rio
deliberations.
United
Nations Climate Change negotiations, void of gender-related texts and
discussions until 2008, have more recently reflected an increased understanding
of the links between gender equality and responding to climate change.
It has become necessary
because women bear the biggest brunt of climate change, the impact and effect
much more than they affect men.
Climate
change impacts and responses are not gender-neutral; thus
climate financing mechanisms and resource allocations meant to address
these differentiated impacts must be gender-responsive.
Hayford
Duodu of the Dedicated Grant Mechanism for Local Communities Project
(DGM-GHANA), added that women’s direct participation in climate
change decision making is very critical.
According
to him, the indigenous knowledge of the indigenous women directly impacted by
the effect of climate change cannot be overlooked and must be tapped.
“Their
worth of indigenous knowledge is a crucial aspect to effectively and
equitably designing, implementing, and funding climate solutions, he said”.
Gender-responsive
climate finance architecture can play a profound role in supporting a
comprehensive climate change framework and complementary sustainable development
pathway that promotes an equal and resilient economy for women and men.
It is therefore important to ensure
equal space and resources for women and men to participate in climate change
decision making and action at all levels.
No comments:
Post a Comment