The
paper urges a rethink of the increasingly popular policy goal of “sustainable
intensification”, which aims to produce more food per unit area in ways that
exert less pressure on the environment.
While
this is important, say the authors, it is too simple a definition, and it
ignores other radical changes that are also required to tackle waste, improve
governance and resilience, and reduce the resource-intensity of consumption.
“Sustainable
intensification — as policymakers currently understand it— does not guarantee
food security,” says co-author Dr Camilla Toulmin, director of the
International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). “We need a new
and more sophisticated definition; one that is clearer about what sustainable
intensification can and cannot achieve, about how and where it should be
implemented, and about how it will interact with other important areas of food
policy”.
The
authors identify five areas of policymaking that national or international
efforts to pursue sustainable intensification will affect: biodiversity and
land-use; animal welfare; human nutrition; rural economies; and sustainable
development.
“To
feed the world’s growing population, we must do more than simply produce more
food per unit area in ways that exert less pressure on the environment,” says
Dr Toulmin. “We must also ensure that food is diverse and rich in
micronutrients, and that we make the right choices when allocating land for
farm production or biodiversity.”
“We
must ensure that sustainable intensification contributes to other important
goals for rural development, such as climate-resilient livelihoods for poor
farmers, and we must revitalise agricultural extension services and use modern
communications tools ensure that these farmers can participate.”
No comments:
Post a Comment