Human-caused warming made the heavy rainfall up to 10 times more likely in Greece, Bulgaria and Türkiye and up to 50 times more likely in Libya, with building in flood plains, poor dam maintenance and other local factors turning the extreme weather into a humanitarian disaster
Heavy rainfall, which caused devastation in large parts
of the Mediterranean in early September, was made more likely to happen by
climate change resulting from greenhouse gas emissions, according to rapid
analysis by an international team of climate scientists from the World Weather
Attribution group.
The study also found that the destruction caused by the
heavy rain was much greater due to factors that included construction in
flood-prone areas, deforestation, and the consequences of the conflict in
Libya.
“The Mediterranean is a hotspot of climate
change-fueled hazards. After a summer of devastating heatwaves and wildfires
with a very clear climate change fingerprint, quantifying the contribution of
global warming to these floods proved more challenging. But there is absolutely
no doubt that reducing vulnerability and increasing resilience to all types of extreme
weather is paramount for saving lives in the future,” said Friederike Otto,
Senior Lecturer in Climate Science at Grantham Institute - Climate Change and
the Environment, Imperial College London.
In early September, a cut-off low which affected Spain
and a low-pressure system named Storm Daniel, which formed in the Eastern
Mediterranean, brought large amounts of rain over a 10-day period to several
countries, including Spain, Greece, Bulgaria, Türkiye and Libya. The heavy rain
led to massive floods across the region, killing four people in Bulgaria, five
in Spain, seven in Türkiye, and 17 in Greece. The greatest disaster occurred in
Libya, where the floods caused the collapse of two dams. While the exact number
of casualties is still not clear, there are currently 3,958 confirmed deaths in
Derna alone and 170 people elsewhere in Libya, with over 10,000 people still
missing.
To quantify the effect of climate change on the heavy
rain in the region, scientists analysed climate data and computer model
simulations to compare the climate as it is today, after about 1.2°C of global
warming since the late 1800s, with the climate of the past, following
peer-reviewed methods.
The scientists divided their analysis in three regions:
Libya, where the analysis focused on the northeast part of the country, where
most of the rainfall fell; Greece, Bulgaria and Türkiye, where the analysis
looked at maximum rainfall over four consecutive days; and Spain, where most of
the rain fell in just a few hours.
For Libya, the scientists found that human-caused
climate change made the event up to 50 times more likely to happen, with up to
50% more rain during the period, as a result of human-caused greenhouse gas
emissions. The event is still extremely unusual, and can only be expected to
occur around once in 300-600 years, in the current climate.
For Greece, Bulgaria and Türkiye, the analysis showed
that climate change made the heavy rain up to 10 times more likely to happen,
with up to 40% more rain, as a result of human activities that have warmed the planet.
For this large region, which encompasses parts of the
three countries, the event is now reasonably common, and can be expected about
once every 10 years, meaning it has a 10% chance of happening each year. For
central Greece, where most of the impacts took place, the event is less
probable and only expected to happen once every 80-100 years, equivalent to a
1-1.25% chance of happening each year.
“The extreme rainfall amounts that affected central
Greece and their devastating effects are a breaking point in the way we should
re-organise the early warning systems towards impact-based alerts, the Civil
Protection response capacity, and the design of resilient infrastructures in
the era of climate change,” noted Vassiliki
Kotroni, Research Director at the National Observatory of Athens.
In Spain, where most of the rain fell in just a few
hours, the scientists estimated that such heavy rainfall is expected once every
40 years, but they could not conduct a full attribution analysis as the
available climate models poorly represent heavy rainfall on timescales shorter
than a day.
These findings have large mathematical uncertainties,
as the events occurred over relatively small areas, and most climate models do
not represent rainfall on these small scales well.
While the scientists cannot completely rule out the
possibility that climate change has not affected the likelihood and intensity
of events like these, they are confident that it did play a role for several
reasons: increased temperatures generally lead to heavier rainfall and studies
project heavier rain in the region as temperatures rise; they could find no
evidence of factors that might be making heavy rain less likely and balancing
the influence of climate change; and weather station data in the region shows a
trend towards heavier rain. Because of the limits in the models, the scientists
did not give a central estimate of the influence of climate change, as they
have done in previous studies, instead giving an upper-bound of the effect.
A key finding of the study is that the very large
impacts observed in some of the regions were caused by a combination of high
vulnerability of the population and their exposure to the event. In the
affected area in Central Greece, most of the cities and communities and a large
part of the infrastructure are located in flood-prone areas. In Libya, a
combination of several factors including long-lasting armed conflict, political
instability, potential design flaws and poor maintenance of dams all
contributed to the disaster. The interaction of these factors, and the very
heavy rain that was worsened by climate change, created the extreme
destruction.
The study was conducted by 13 researchers as part of
the World Weather Attribution group, including scientists from universities and
research centres in Greece, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United
States.
According to Julie Arrighi, Director at the Red Cross
Red Crescent Climate Centre, “This devastating disaster shows how climate
change-fueled extreme weather events are combining with human factors to create
even bigger impacts, as more people, assets and infrastructure are exposed and
vulnerable to flood risks. However, there are practical solutions that can help
us prevent these disasters from becoming routine such as strengthened emergency
management, improved impact-based forecasts and warning systems, and
infrastructure that is designed for the future climate.”
No comments:
Post a Comment