Global climate damages from emissions associated with the top 25 oil and gas ‘carbon majors’ between 1985 and 2018 are estimated at 20 trillion USD compared to the 30 trillion USD they earned over the same period, according to a new report released by international think tank Climate Analytics.
The
top three emitters are Saudi Arabia’s Aramco, Russian government-owned Gazprom,
the National Iranian Oil company, and the top investor-owned companies are
ExxonMobil, Shell, BP and Chevron. The list also includes the company led by
the president of this year’s international climate negotiations: the Abu Dhabi
National Oil Company.
“These
oil and gas majors have known about climate change for decades, yet they have
doubled down on their business model. They have reaped massive financial gains,
while climate change has intensified and left vulnerable peoples, and
particularly developing countries, footing the bill,” said lead author Dr
Carl-Friedrich Schleussner.
The
authors used a middle-of-the-road estimate for the social cost of carbon – 185
USD per tonne of CO2 – to calculate the damage estimates. Oil majors
were attributed with a third of the damages, sharing responsibility equally
with governments and consumers.
2022
super profits
In
2022 energy prices skyrocketed, and the financial gains for oil and gas
companies reached record highs. Aramco announced what its CEO called “probably
the highest net income ever recorded in the corporate world.”
For
2022, authors were able to gather data for a subset of seven carbon majors
including Aramco, Exxon Mobil, and Shell, showing that financial gains were
almost twice the estimated damages caused by their emissions that year – 497
billion USD compared to 260 billion USD.
Self-perpetuating
fossil wealth
The
report also compares damages to sovereign wealth funds, which were largely
created using profits from fossil fuel extraction.
The
United Arab Emirates, host of this years’ international climate negotiations,
is home to the biggest combined sovereign wealth funds. Half of its funds could
pay for the damages caused by the emissions associated with its oil and gas
industry between 1985 and 2018, and it would still have 700 billion USD in
wealth.
“Since
their establishment, these funds have grown to such an extent that it’s clear
that ‘fossil wealth’ is now perpetuating itself. But the other legacy of this
wealth is climate devastation,” said report author Dr Marina Andrijevic.
Last
year at COP27 all governments acknowledged that there was a need for new
sources of funding for loss and damage. Mia Mottley, the Prime Minister of
Barbados, specifically called for a 10% tax on oil and gas company profits to
pay into a loss and damage fund.
“After
last year’s super profits some of these companies are walking back their
climate commitments, showing that we can’t rely on them to do this on their own
– certainly not at the pace that we need. Governments should step in and tax
polluters to pay for the loss and damage they are causing. We also need a firm
commitment in the COP28 outcome to phase out fossil fuels to keep 1.5°C alive,”
concluded Schleussner.
No comments:
Post a Comment