Technical negotiations during the first week of
the climate talks in Lima (COP20) have mostly gone smoothly, but important
negotiating-team level discussions on a handful of key issues need to conclude
this week so that there is wide agreement on the range of options facing the
Ministers as they arrive early next week to pick up the high-level
negotiations.
Negotiations are focussing in on critical
elements including the nature of country pledges for the upcoming Paris
agreement, pledges known as intended nationally determined contributions
(INDCs). Countries will need clarity on the rules and format for these pledges
as they are due to be delivered in the next 3-6 month. One key issue that
Ministers must contend is the time period the pledges will cover.
“The timeframe issue is our key worry” explains
Li Shuo from Greenpeace China. “A short commitment period would do a lot of
good things but it hasn’t been discussed in an extensive manner. We learnt from
the Kyoto Protocol that an 8-year period makes it very difficult to ratchet
measures up as changes take place in the real world.
“In China, for example, things are changing
fast, coal consumption is down 1-2% this year. The Marshall Islands have sent a
very positive signal, arguing for a 5 year commitment period that can capture
the most relevant and fresh circumstances in the real world. Countries will
submit their INDCs early next year so we need to make progress over a
short-term commitment period here in Lima.”
Discussions about what actions need to be taken
to tackle climate change before 2020 have been noticeably absent from the negotiations
so far. Although The Paris Agreement is set to be reached in 2015, it won't
kick-in until 2020, leaving unaddressed what action countries should take in
the six years before then.
Shuo explained, “we are already approaching the
end of the week and we are worried that we won’t have enough time to discuss
this vital element of a draft Paris agreement. We need to ensure that countries
are sufficiently prepared to capture the low hanging fruit. This is about
securing short-term actions that countries can take that will form the basis
for ongoing climate action.”
Negotiators also need to focus on how a Paris
agreement would help countries affected by climate change adapt to the
challenges that they face. A new UNEP report shows reveals that the cost of
this adaptation could reach $150 billion by 2030, underlining how vitally important
this aspect is.
“We believe there won’t be agreement in Paris
if adaptation is not included in the draft of the agreement - most countries
asking for it. Fortunately the talks are going smoothly and we are making
progress on this issue”, said Tania Guillén from Centro Humboldt
Nicaragua/SUSWATCH.
When ministers arrive for the high level
negotiations next week will have to decide whether the current structure of the
draft Paris agreement provides those suffering from climate impacts that are
“locked-in” with enough support or whether a new mechanism needs to be
established to compensate for loss and damage.
Many delegations are seeking for a clear
pathway to ramp up financial and technological support. “We think that $10
billion already pledged by rich nations is not enough for vulnerable countries
to deal with the impacts of climate change”, said Guillén.
Ministers also need to discuss the option of
having an adaptation goal, an idea that really needs fleshing out. “They have
to decide whether this will be part of the new agreement and whether it will be
part of the INDCs. If adaptation is included within national climate action
plans it will help to reinforce this vital pillar of the entire convention”.
With so much to do and, clearly, so much at
stake, we are expecting a late night at the UN climate negotiations here in
Lima.
On the side lines
Norway
has announced that it has doubled its pledge to the Green Climate Fund to
approximately $230 million bringing the fund slightly closer to
the lower end of the unofficial $10-15 billion target range.
However, Australian Foreign Minister Julie
Bishop announced that Australia will not contribute to the Green Climate Fund.
Germany has approved a new plan to cut greenhouse gas
emissions to help meet its 2020 targets. Hidden in the fine print is an
impressive CO2 reduction goal for the energy sector, adding up to an impressive
93 million tonnes that the energy sector is required to cut before 2020.
The chief negotiator for China, Su
Wei, has announced that China favours a ten-year commitment period for the
climate agreement to be signed by the countries in Paris in a year's time.
No comments:
Post a Comment