“Negotiations
on a new climate deal are struggling due to trust issues – but we will not be
hoodwinked by technical or procedural tricks,” stated Mithika Mwenda, General
Secretary of the Pan African Climate Justice Alliance (PACJA) at a press
conference.
He
was referring to problems at the talks over the chairing and a renewed focus on
how to account for emissions from land-use, a central issue for many Africans
dependent on the land for their livelihoods.
The
two-week UN talks in Bonn, Germany are focused on increasing climate actions in
the near-term and on creating a new climate agreement for 2015 – to come into
effect in 2020.
“Negotiations
can’t work when promises are broken. We were promised a legal second commitment
period of Kyoto, we don’t have it. We were promised that emission cuts would be
strengthened this year, they weren’t,” noted Aissatou Diouf from ENDA, a non-profit organisation based in Dakar, Senegal.
Africa, represented by Sudan, has discussed
the non-carbon benefits, REDDplus and agriculture at the ongoing SBSTA 40
Summit.
“Agriculture is very important to the African continent in context of food security,
sustainable development and poverty eradication and we must address adaptation in full contest,” reads a statement
from Sudan.
“We
cannot have a situation where because of UN rules we count emissions from
farming as if it were industrial emissions. It would open the door to trading
in the soil of African farmers by the bankers in Europe. Comparing apples and
oranges like that puts the whole fruit-cart at risk,” said Hindou U. Ibrahim from
AFPAT, an Indigenous Peoples Organisation based in Chad.
African
civil society is concerned about a new deal of counting emissions from the
land-sector in Africa but don’t want to see farming left out completely. “In
fact it has to be there for adaptation,” said Mandla Hadebe, FOCCISA/EJN a
faith-based organization in Cape Town, South Africa. “There must be sharing of
finance and technology to allow the farmers in Africa who are hit by climate
change they have not caused to be able to respond”.
Mr.
Mwenda concluded that “the talks started with the laughable suggestion from Mr.
Obama that a policy of keeping US emissions above 1990 levels well into the
2030s somehow counts as leadership. Policy like that is leading us straight to
4C of warming and untold problems of hunger and starvation in Africa”.
No comments:
Post a Comment