A new World Bank study on poverty and shared
prosperity says that extreme poverty worldwide continues to fall despite the
lethargic state of the global economy. But it warns that given projected growth
trends, reducing high inequality may be a necessary component to reaching the
world’s goal of ending extreme poverty by 2030.
According to the inaugural edition of Poverty and Shared Prosperity—a new series that will
report on the latest and most accurate estimates and trends in global poverty
and shared prosperity annually—nearly 800 million people lived on less than US
$ 1.90 a day in 2013. That is around 100 million fewer extremely poor people
than in 2012.
Progress on extreme poverty was driven mainly by East
Asia and Pacific, especially China and Indonesia, and by India. Half of the
world’s extreme poor now live in Sub-Saharan Africa, and another third live in
South Asia.
In 60 out of the 83 countries covered by the new report
to track shared prosperity, average incomes went up for people living in the
bottom 40 percent of their countries between 2008 and 2013, despite the
financial crisis. Importantly, these countries represent 67 percent of the
world’s population.
“It’s remarkable that
countries have continued to reduce poverty and boost shared prosperity at a
time when the global economy is underperforming—but still far too many people
live with far too little,” said World Bank
Group President Jim Yong Kim. “Unless
we can resume faster global growth and reduce inequality, we risk missing our
World Bank target of ending extreme poverty by 2030. The message is clear: to
end poverty, we must make growth work for the poorest, and one of the surest
ways to do that is to reduce high inequality, especially in those countries
where many poor people live.”
Taking on Inequality
Contrary to popular
belief, inequality between all people in the world has declined consistently
since 1990. And even within-country inequality has been falling in many places
since 2008—for every country that saw a substantial increase in inequality
during this time period, two others saw a similar decrease. Inequality is still
far too high, however, and important concerns remain around the concentration
of wealth among those at the top of the income distribution.
Noting “no room
for complacency” the reports finds that in 34 of 83 countries monitored,
income gaps widened as incomes grew faster among the wealthiest 60 percent of
people than among the bottom 40. And in 23 countries, the bottom 40 saw their
incomes actually decline during these years: not just relative to wealthier
members of society, but in absolute terms.
By studying a group of countries including Brazil,
Cambodia, Mali, Peru, and Tanzania, which have reduced inequality significantly
over recent years, and examining a wide body of available evidence, Bank
researchers identified the following six high-impact strategies: policies with
a proven track record of building poor people’s earnings, improving their
access to essential services, and improving their long-term development
prospects, without damaging growth.
These policies work best when paired with strong growth,
good macroeconomic management, and well-functioning labor markets that create
jobs and enable the poorest to take advantage of those opportunities.
Early childhood development
and nutrition: these measures help children during their first 1,000 days of life, as
nutritional deficiencies and cognitive underdevelopment during this period can
lead to learning delays and lower educational achievement later in life.
Universal health coverage: Bringing coverage
to those excluded from affordable and timely health care reduces inequality
while at the same time increasing people’s capacity to learn, work, and
progress.
Universal access to quality
education: school enrollments have grown across the globe, and the focus must shift
from simply getting children into school towards ensuring that every child,
everywhere benefits from a quality education. Education for all children must
prioritize universal learning, knowledge, and skills development, as well as
teacher quality.
Cash transfers to poor
families: These programs provide poor families with basic incomes,
enabling them to keep children in school and allowing mothers to access basic
health care. They can also help families buy things like seeds, fertilizer, or
livestock, and cope with drought, floods, pandemics, economic crises, or other
potentially devastating shocks. They have been shown to considerably reduce
poverty and create opportunity for parents and children alike.
Rural infrastructure- especially
roads and electrification: Building rural roads
reduces transportation costs, connects rural farmers to markets to sell their
goods, allows workers to move more freely, and promotes access to schools and
health care clinics. Electrification in rural communities in Guatemala and
South Africa, for example, has helped increase women’s employment. Electricity
also makes small home-based businesses more viable and productive, which is
particularly of use in poor, rural communities.
Progressive taxation: Fair,
progressive taxes can fund government policies and programs needed to level the
playing field and transfer resources to the poorest, and tax systems can be
designed to decrease inequality while at the same time keeping efficiency costs
low.
“Some of these measures can
rapidly affect income inequality. Others deliver benefits more gradually. None
is a miracle cure,” said Kim. “But all are supported
by strong evidence, and many are within the financial and technical reach of
countries. Adopting the same policies doesn’t mean that all countries will get
the same results, but the policies we’ve identified have worked repeatedly in
different settings around the world”.
No comments:
Post a Comment