He
feels “disillusioned and frightened” because the gains in private
entrepreneurship and multiparty democracy made under the 1992 Constitution are
being besieged and attacked by what he terms the three explosively destructive
evils creeping into the Ghanaian body politics.
According
to him, the Fourth Republic over the last 17 years is being “shamefully
brutalized and overtaken by the triplet evils of massive corruption, naked and
shameless vocal practices of tribalism and conscienceless political party
polarization of all national issues and concerns”.
He
has therefore enjoined all interest groups in the national polity to take bold
steps in addressing the challenge.
Mr.
Appiah Menka has been addressing the 8th Re-Akoto and Seven Others
Memorial Lecture to mark the Annual Law Week of the Ghana School of Law.
His
subject was: “The Law and Private Entrepreneurship Development – the Essential
Tool for the Promotion of Multi-Party Democracy; Case Study, Ghana”.
The
Senior Lawyer chronicled the country’s checkered political history and legal journey
in relation to the promotion of private entrepreneurship and concluded there is
a change in the horizon with the choice and presentation of Dr.
Mahamudu Bawumia and Kwesi Amissah-Arthur as running mates for the 2008
and 2012 Presidential Elections.
Mr.
Appiah Menka is optimistic such personalities will play above politics to bring
their indepth knowledge in solving development problems to bear in developing
the private sector.
“The
future of the nation then, from this 2012 is going to be determined by which of
the political parties can best solve the problems of the private sector to
enable Ghana get into the trail of Korea and the Asian Tigers for our
development”, he noted.
The
business magnate however cautioned that if the triplet evils are not uprooted,
Ghanaians “shall behave like the animals in George Orwell’s Animal Farm, where
in the end the animals outside looked from man to pigs and from pigs to man and
from man to pigs again, but it was already impossible to find which was which”.
No comments:
Post a Comment